<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Of Projections and Policies &#8211; Natural Gas and Transportation Fuels</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ourenergypolicy.org/of-projections-and-policies-natural-gas-and-transportation-fuels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ourenergypolicy.org/of-projections-and-policies-natural-gas-and-transportation-fuels/</link>
	<description>Expert Discussion on Energy Policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 21:17:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Manto</title>
		<link>http://www.ourenergypolicy.org/of-projections-and-policies-natural-gas-and-transportation-fuels/#comment-1059</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Manto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 09:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ourenergypolicy.org/?p=11509#comment-1059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Assuming a 50% reduction of pollution from any gaseous or liquid fuels because of new technology at little additional cost, and assuming peak oil pricing dynamics that will increase the price of fossil fuels at some point in the future that include an on-going need to reserve fossil fuels for the chemical industry, what would our 5 year plan, versus our 50 year plan versus our 500 year plan look like for fossil fuels as opposed to similar renewable fuels (e.g. hydrogen or bio-fuels?)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Assuming a 50% reduction of pollution from any gaseous or liquid fuels because of new technology at little additional cost, and assuming peak oil pricing dynamics that will increase the price of fossil fuels at some point in the future that include an on-going need to reserve fossil fuels for the chemical industry, what would our 5 year plan, versus our 50 year plan versus our 500 year plan look like for fossil fuels as opposed to similar renewable fuels (e.g. hydrogen or bio-fuels?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marshall Kaplan</title>
		<link>http://www.ourenergypolicy.org/of-projections-and-policies-natural-gas-and-transportation-fuels/#comment-1052</link>
		<dc:creator>Marshall Kaplan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 16:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ourenergypolicy.org/?p=11509#comment-1052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our Energy Policy did a great job editing down a longer piece on Fuel Freedom&#039;s blog. It is my fault that on reading a couplve of key sentences were left out of the piece above. Let me summarize their thoughts without going back to the original....Demand for natural gas and other alternative fuels like methanol and ethanol would likely reflect higher numbers if Congress, as it should, enacts flex fuel legislation and encourages Detroit to produce more flex fuel autos. Demand would also increase if EPA facilitated convervsion of older cars to alternative fuels, such as methanol, and perhaps other alternative fuels and car makers remooved restraints on gas stations concerning placing alternative fuel pumps on site. We would be better off re fuel costs, the environment, the economy and security]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our Energy Policy did a great job editing down a longer piece on Fuel Freedom&#8217;s blog. It is my fault that on reading a couplve of key sentences were left out of the piece above. Let me summarize their thoughts without going back to the original&#8230;.Demand for natural gas and other alternative fuels like methanol and ethanol would likely reflect higher numbers if Congress, as it should, enacts flex fuel legislation and encourages Detroit to produce more flex fuel autos. Demand would also increase if EPA facilitated convervsion of older cars to alternative fuels, such as methanol, and perhaps other alternative fuels and car makers remooved restraints on gas stations concerning placing alternative fuel pumps on site. We would be better off re fuel costs, the environment, the economy and security</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
