Henry M. Goldberg
Areas of Expertise: Clean Energy, Energy Economics, Environmental Policy, Infrastructure, Natural Gas, Smart Grid
Additional Areas of Expertise: energy policy modeling, digital capacity infrastructure, North American energy trade, strategic planning, market analysis
Henry M. Goldberg is originally from Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, and currently resides in Phoenix, Arizona. He obtained his Ph.D. in Operations Research from Cornell University. He was a professor at the University of Alberta and visiting professor at Stanford University in the late 1970's and early 1980's researching North American energy markets and policy issues. Some of his major accomplishments during this period were: working with a colleague at the University of Alberta to build the BALANCE model of long-term Canadian energy supply and demand, developing the dynamic equilibrium energy modeling methodology to integrate supply and demand at consistent prices over times, quantifying the economic benefits to Canada of moving to world pricing for oil and natural gas, analyzing Canadian natural gas export policy to the U.S. and the benefits of deregulation, and organizing important conferences of policymakers in Canada, the U.S., and Mexico on the North American natural gas trade. He has also been a systems engineer, strategic planner, and market analyst in the telecommunications industry working at AT&T Bell Labs, Nortel Networks, Industry Canada, and Reed Elsevier.
He authored the freelance article "Creating an American Infrastructure Investment Strategy" (posted in the OurEnergyPolicy.org Resources section), which describes the benefits/costs and infrastructure strategies required to address the energy/global warming crisis. In 2012, he was part of a task group that wrote "Arizona's Strategic Plan for Digital Capacity". which examines the long-term benefits of digital capacity development for the state of Arizona and the necessary digital infrastructure directions to achieve this. He has been a participant in OurEnergyPolicy.org since April 2009.
Recent Comments by Henry M. Goldberg
- "I appreciate Congressman Van Hollen's proposal to seriously address climate change, but I don't believe his approach is the right one. Putting a majo" on Protecting Our Climate and the Middle Class
- "Carbon taxes should be one important component of an overall strategy to address climate change. Carbon taxes on oil and coal production would result" on Would a carbon tax effectively combat climate change?
- "Congressman Whitfield attacks the Obama administration proposed EPA power plant CO2 emissions regulation initiative quoting a US Chamber of Commerce s" on Obama’s EPA to Cost Americans Billions of Dollars and Hundreds of Thousands of Jobs
- "The United States and other countries should be planning for a next-generation multi-fuel service station infrastructure to enable the transition away" on Let Freedom Ring: Oil Companies, Capitalism and Fuel Choice
- "Ike: Thanks very much for pointing out the cost of Germany's renewable energy program. However, you are ignoring the future costs of global warmin" on Can Natural Gas and Renewables Be Synergistic, Not Competitive?
- "I would like to see the federal government mandate a study by the U.S. electric power industry, possibly managed by the Electric Power Research Instit" on Can Natural Gas and Renewables Be Synergistic, Not Competitive?
- "The U.S. LNG export issue, like all future major energy policy issues, must be framed in the context of addressing global warming in the most effectiv" on Prosperity at Home And Strengthened Allies Abroad – A Global Perspective on Natural Gas Exports
- "To properly address climate change, the focus of the EPA should be on carbon capture and storage (CCS) from existing coal-fired power plants. New coa" on The Economic Impacts of Eliminating Coal from Our Energy Portfolio
- "Mr. Kiefer and Mr. Lane, thank you for your comments on my post on the "Social Cost of Carbon". Mr. Kiefer you provide some interesting details on" on Why The EPA’s “Social Cost of Carbon” Fails
- "I've read the comments on both sides of the "Social Cost of Carbon" debate. The debate revolves around a variety of issues: whether global warming is" on Why The EPA’s “Social Cost of Carbon” Fails