In our discussion of the use of global warming potential (GWP) values in the Howarth et al (2011) paper, our text implies that the GISS group’s 2009 and 2010 papers (Shindell et al 2009 and Unger et al 2010) were contradictory. Such an interpretation does not reflect the conclusions of those papers and was not our intention. First, the 2009 and 2010 papers address GWP and radiative forcing, respectively. Our intentions in that paragraph were (a) to illustrate the possible ways that the GWP and radiative forcing discussions in the scientific community were misapplied to lifecycle analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from unconventional gas extraction, and (b) to underscore that the reasonable questions about GWP raised by Shindell et al (2009) are a justification for retaining a broader, rather than narrower, range of GWP possibilities for this calculation.