A recent “60 Minutes” segment essentially called the cleantech industry a failure, eliciting a flurry of criticisms defending the green technology sector. “Hoping to create innovation and jobs, [President Obama] committed north of $100 billion in loans, grants and tax breaks to cleantech. But instead of breakthroughs, the sector suffered a string of expensive tax-funded flops. Suddenly cleantech was a dirty word,” said “60 Minutes'” host, Lesley Stahl.
One of the main criticisms against the CBS segment was that it conflated the cleantech venture capital sector of Silicon Valley with the Department of Energy’s loan guarantee program. The critics have pointed out that the DOE loan program’s mission is “to accelerate commercial deployment of innovative clean energy technologies, including job creating,” and not to make money, as VC’s are aligned to do. Furthermore, many critics of the “60 Minutes” piece point to the massive developments and growth in both wind and solar as evidence that, despite big name busts such as Solyndra, the loan program has been successful. But Katie Fehrenbacher, Senior Writer for GigaOM, noted that “60 Minutes” accurately showed that from a “purely venture capital perspective, cleantech has been ugly and has crashed.”
How is the cleantech industry faring, and what does its future look like? Should the government be involved in cleantech, and if so, how?
My thoughts on the 60 Minutes segment just went up on my column at The Energy Collective. To summarize, though, I think the piece was wildly misleading by not providing… Read more »
I have weighed in on this a few times already, but the bottom line message I tried to convey to Lesley Stahl is that it’s a complicated topic. There are… Read more »
I am basically repeating the comment which I made on the GigoOM site: As someone who has been in energy and energy technology for some time, I don’t think Silicon… Read more »
What I found most striking about the 60 minutes piece was its ability to spend 20 minutes on the subject without mentioning the words climate change or any variant thereof… Read more »
The only thing surprising about the “60 Minutes” segment on Cleantech is that anyone should be surprised. As my book, U.S. Energy Policy and the Pursuit of Failure (Cambridge University… Read more »
Strong opinions. Any comment on the Acid Rain program? It was a government market intervention (actually initiated by a Republican Administration) that very much dictated market behavior (similar to an… Read more »
The government may well have a role to play in ameliorating externalities especially where the effects are local or regional, and success or failure is fairly straightforward to ascertain—as has… Read more »
The 60 Minutes piece was nonsense, had poor research, no data, and anecdotal evidence. According to Bloomberg New Energy Finance (BNEF), while global clean energy investment (public and private) in… Read more »
One quick comment not on the substance of the piece, because I have not seen it. I find it problematic to discuss wind and solar capacity as if it is… Read more »
If you didn’t catch it, Vinod Khosla, founder of Khosla Ventures and featured industry figure in the CBS cleantech segment, published a very critical open letter to “60 Minutes.”
Didn’t 60 Minutes jump the shark with that Benghazi report anyway? I have not seen the 60 Minutes piece, and have no intention to (despite my fellow columnist Robert Rapier… Read more »