Donald Trump claims to have an “America First” energy plan. His administration’s actions over the past 10 months have made it clear that what he truly puts first are the interests of oil, gas and coal executives. Everyday Americans and our iconic American landscapes come last, if he considers them at all. Republicans used to label their policies “energy independence” and now call it “energy dominance,” but it looks more like the ransacking of our public lands and the fleecing of American taxpayers. The public wants a smarter way forward – an energy strategy that prioritizes renewables, takes climate change seriously, and returns balance to how we manage our public lands – A Democratic approach to energy.
That’s why 17 of my colleagues and I just introduced the “Sustainable Energy Development Reform Act“, a bill designed to benefit everyday citizens instead of lining industry pockets. It offers a way forward for our nation’s energy development that balances our need for power with the health, environmental and economic interests of working people.
For years, companies have reaped outrageous profits from the extraction of natural resources that belong to all Americans. The royalty rates, rental charges, and other fees associated with development have not kept pace with inflation, let alone the environmental and social costs of mining and drilling. Polluters don’t just enjoy amazing financial benefits from working on public lands. They take advantage of huge regulatory loopholes in our environmental laws, including several that Republicans in Congress gave them in the Energy Policy Act of 2005. Oil and gas companies already hold nearly 8,000 approved permits they’re not using. They don’t need more handouts or weaker leasing standards.
The Sustainable Energy Development Reform Act takes a more realistic approach. It makes sure that oil, gas and coal companies don’t enjoy more benefits on public land than hunters, fishers, campers, and any other users of public land. It makes fossil fuel companies pay a fair amount to drill or mine, makes overdue reforms to drilling safety standards, closes environmental loopholes, and requires the federal government to take climate change seriously and plan for it, not ignore it. It protects the health of people living near fossil fuel operations by restricting the resulting pollution and encourages the development of renewable energy. In short, the act views our treasured natural landscape as a resource in its own right, to be managed carefully and protectively, and not simply as a cash cow to be exploited or dominated for unsustainable short-term profits. This is the core of a Democratic approach to energy.
The Congress has done poor job of responding to the global warming phenomenon. It has done so out of institutional ignorance of details of the scientific method of investigation. This ignorance has… Read more »
Contrary to the unintelligable comment above … the Sustainable Energy Development Reform Act is the right thing to do. It proposes taking necessary steps to update the laws surrounding our… Read more »
Dear Jane, The BNEF projection of a 71% reduction in the LCOE of off-shore wind power of 71% by 2040 is significantly at odds with the EIA projections. EIA projects… Read more »
Herschel, The National Offshore Wind Strategy, updated in 2016 by DOE and DOI, arrived at different numbers than you quote from EIA. That report says offshore wind costs can drop… Read more »
Not sure EIA is the place I’d look to for price (or adoption) projections.
New stuff re projections .. MIT research suggests U.S. vastly overstates oil production forecasts Dec. 1, 2017 9:01 AM ET|By: Carl Surran, SA News Editor “Researchers at MIT say they… Read more »
1. The health impacts (not including climate impacts) of fossil fuel energy greatly exceed the value of the energy produced. In other words, fossil fuel energy has negative social value.… Read more »
The mounting evidence about the causes and costs of climate change should help enact bills such as the Sustainable Energy Development Reform Act recently introduced by 18 members of Congress.… Read more »
I commend Congressman Grijalva and his co-sponsoring colleagues for their introduction of the Sustainable Energy Development Reform Act. And, whereas I agree with the need for: · closing… Read more »
The Juliana case, or The Children’s Trust case, is something to watch … a legal landmark. “Their complaint asserts that, through the government’s affirmative actions that cause climate change, it… Read more »
As we ponder climate change and what to do about it, I highly recommend reading “The Little Ice Age – How Climate Made History 1300-1850” by Brian Fagan. This book… Read more »
Mr Kadak, I too would like to make a recommendation to readers regarding the scientific untangling of the natural and human Drivers of Climate Change … https://www.ucsusa.org/global-warming/science-and-impacts/science/human-contribution-to-gw-faq.html#.Wjl-6ktG20L ~Given the rising… Read more »
What is your argument for the proposition that governments are currently capable of combating climate change?