A Citigroup analysis of North American oil production suggests that the continent could become the “new Middle East.” The report, ENERGY 2020: North America, the New Middle East?, projects increased oil production as having significant effects throughout North American economies, with an increase in the United States’ real GDP of 2.0 to 3.3% from new production, reduced consumption, and associated activity.
The report points out that “the main obstacles to developing a North American oil surplus are political rather than geological or technological.” In response to the growth in shale development, state and federal governments are crafting regulations to address environmental concerns such as groundwater pollution and increased seismic activity in near well sites. Regulations of greenhouse gases could also complicate oil and gas development in the U.S.
The Oil Drum, an oil and energy blog, argues that the report’s assumptions are overly optimistic, pointing to questions about the future productivity and viability of shale plays across the U.S., as well as declining productivity of current Gulf of Mexico oil rigs and Alaskan oil fields.
What do you make of the Citigroup projections? Could North America become the “new Middle East?” If it can, should it? Does the rising potential of domestic and regional oil and gas production complicate the pursuit of other technologies and policy goals?
Leaving aside the fact that this is a theoretical exercise based on optimistic projections for extracting all technically available crude in North America and the practical implications of what the… Read more »
I think Elias is being generous. Dr. Morse’s op-ed is wildly optimistic at best. The key question is whether non conventional oil (from bitumen, oil shales, etc.) can be ramped… Read more »
As much extrapolation of a recent trend (3 years) as in the chart above is always a stretch. Nonetheless, much of the increase (45+%) is in North Dakota, presumably from… Read more »
From an absolute standpoint I don’t think anyone is suggesting that there isn’t oil to be gotten out of the ground, the question is at what cost. To achieve even… Read more »
Do you see the two separate areas of policy support to be mutually exclusive? Cost is an obvious problem. Could an old fashioned Jimmy Carter oil import tax help pay… Read more »
Theoretically, no. The two pieces are not mutually exclusive and with a well thought out and comprehensive energy policy the support could be complimentary (and I think that’s true even… Read more »
A very interesting, entirely believable and utterly depressing reply, Elias. Obama did finally get it right when he suggested “all of the above” as an appropriate energy policy strategy. If… Read more »