New and emerging innovations in renewable energy suggest the real possibility—probability even—of a future where everyone has access to abundant clean energy. While supporting these advancements is vital to a sustainable future, it is perhaps more crucial that our legislators create and codify solid energy efficiency standards that can reduce our carbon emissions. In 2018, roughly 69% of energy produced in the United States was lost, most often in the form of waste heat, such as exhaust from cars and furnaces. As we shift to new sources of power generation, policy work around minimizing energy waste will help to show us how much energy is truly required to meet demand. As an analogy, before you would improve the quality of feed you give your chickens, you would probably first want to seal the chicken house to keep the mice from eating their food.
This discussion has merit in the residential, business, and industrial sectors; but for now, let’s focus on the residential built environment. As an example, we have the technology and know-how to tighten homes so that they require significantly less energy to keep occupants comfortable. Blower door testing is a proven way to assess a home’s air leakage, but many local building codes don’t require this testing. Reasons for resistance to codes such as these include the cost, the lack of local testing companies to supply the service, and the questions regarding the effectiveness of such regulations and efficiency initiatives. But the benefits of an energy-efficient home are numerous, leading to less energy consumption and lower energy bills for consumers. With the implementation of effective energy efficiency requirements, we can make substantial, meaningful progress toward reducing energy waste.
Solid efficiency standards should frame the discussion around what generation options can best meet the needs of society. Maximum efficiency will result in the need for less generation, which could pave an easier path for the implementation and management of renewables projects.
Lets look at Increasing Natural Gas Energy Efficiency. What natural gas that is not wasted today, will be there to be used another day. Most large commercial sized buildings use… Read more »
Sid – thank you for your perspective from the natural gas industry. I was calling out innovation as a (sometimes) competitor of efficiency, but you give a great example of… Read more »
I wholeheartedly agree that switching to renewable generation does not mean we can neglect energy efficiency. Clean energy may be carbon free, but it is not free of economic costs… Read more »
Thanks, Ed – You outline the short-run/long-run paradox of a carbon tax so well. Staying flexible in our thinking and planning with solution design is key, so that we don’t… Read more »
I have a problem with the “But First ..” part of the title. Energy efficiency is important. We certainly don’t want to overlook it. There’s great potential there. But it’s… Read more »
I share your annoyance at progressives who oppose any kind of carbon fee. Check out this for more on progressive aversions to carbon fees and what can be done about… Read more »
Roger – I agree totally that to arrive at a perfect energy economy, we should use every tool at our disposal. I love the creative thinking behind your cooperative housing… Read more »
Sabrina Cowden’s statement that we waste 69% of our energy is false. Power cycle efficiency is controlled by the laws of thermodynamics (Carnot cycle) that forbid 100% conversion of heat… Read more »
Charles – I understand your point that a goal of 100% energy conversion is unreasonable, and your observation that some heat losses are presently unavoidable. The policy work I would… Read more »
Sabrina, You know me–I’m going to vote for tackling the energy waste in low-income multifamily buildings, which is not an easy problem but is a great opportunity. Multifamily buildings are… Read more »
Yes, Marilyn – I DO know you ????, and you know that I will agree with you especially about the potential for tackling energy waste in low-income, multifamily buildings. There… Read more »
Something to keep in mind, when speaking broadly about “energy efficiency”, is that it’s not really efficiency that we’re concerned with. Not “efficiency” as an engineer might understand it. I.e,… Read more »
Yes, you make a great point that efficiency can take many forms, and you’ve called attention to an important one about the grade of energy. Almost wherever you look, you… Read more »
There are lots of pieces to building energy efficiency … much of it started during Obama’s first term. One of the most important is unlocking the necessary upfront funding with… Read more »
While solar and wind are now cheaper than new fossil fuel energy, we not only need to eliminate new fossil generation, we also need to get rid of all the… Read more »
Dan, I understand all that and if you remember I supported a carbon price in the past. I think the circumstances are now changed due to the defeat of most… Read more »
Jane, my point is that fossil fuels are not priced correctly (and are subsidized) and this has caused — and is still causing — “the biggest market failure in history.”… Read more »
Dan, we are in complete agreement about the price failures regarding fossil fuels, both with the tax expenditures of $20billion and with the health and environmental externalities that are not… Read more »
The statement that utility scale solar and onshore wind are less costly than fossil generation is at best misleading. Yes, the cost per kilowatt-hour of electricity generated is now less… Read more »
There are several approaches to the intermittency issue, but most importantly we need to acknowledge that storage is coming online fast. Here is a Bloomberg report about the latest study… Read more »
Sorry, but overall, I have to disagree. The storage now being added to the grid is overwhelmingly battery storage. To expect that batteries will soon solve the intermittency issue is… Read more »
Another big issue (for the building sector) is the difficulty to value energy efficiency in property assessment. As a result, efficiency upgrades become difficult to implement when their payback time… Read more »
Brent – absolutely. Your comment about the challenge associated with information reliability is spot on. I’m aware of some utilities that provide home energy assessment scores, which are great so… Read more »
It sounds good to talk about improving energy efficiency, reducing end use energy services per BTU across the board. But this is a TERRIBLE metric either from the viewpoint of… Read more »
Roger, you say … “The grid remains reliant on fossil fuels, with contingency capacity equal to all the wind and solar that can’t be counted on.” Please have a look… Read more »
“The Growing Market for Clean Energy Portfolios” is slickly produced (lots on nice graphics) and well done (data sources cited, modeling assumptions explained). It is clearly the work of competent… Read more »
Not sure I understand your criticism. You say that you concluded “the paper is really addressing only the traditional market for “peaking units” that operate for at most a few… Read more »
Yes, it’s a cost comparison, but the comparison is apples to oranges. The battery banks that the report considers have 4 hours of energy capacity at rated power. They are… Read more »
I understand your point about storage BUT … Demand Flexibility and efficiency demand reduction do some of the job that you are assuming storage must do. From p56 of the… Read more »