After the events of COP21, the National Hydropower Association’s (NHA) goal to expand hydropower in America over the next few decades seems especially important. The existing hydro fleet was constructed over the course of an entire century and constitutes the longest-lived energy facilities in the world.
NHA’s goal is to double hydropower by adding 60 GW of capacity by 2030 which will produce an additional 300 billion kWhs of electricity each year, without building a single new dam. Energy Secretary, Ernest Moniz agrees, stating, “Hydropower can double its contributions by the year 2030. We have to pick up the covers off of this hidden renewable that’s right in front of our eyes and continues to have significant potential.”
Recent discussions between the American Hydropower Association and the Department of Energy have resulted in a plan to expand hydropower mainly by using existing non-powered dams for new power and pumped hydro storage. Almost 85% of America’s low-carbon energy sources come from hydropower (20%) and nuclear power (63%), which together avoid almost a billion tons of CO2 emissions each year. If we are to achieve any of the low-carbon goals we have set out for 2030 and beyond, hydropower must increase significantly.
To date, there are about 2,200 hydroelectric plants nationwide totaling 80 GW of capacity, generating 7% of our electricity. About 70% of them are less than 10 MW in size, and half are privately-owned. While the Pacific Northwest leads the nation in installed capacity, the Northeast has the highest concentration of facilities, or number of dams. Of the 80,000 dams nationwide, only 3% are equipped to produce power. Converting dams into sources of generation however requires a complex and lengthy regulatory process that many consider to be antiquated and unnecessarily burdensome. Both the House and Senate recognize that the permitting process must be modified if hydropower capacity is to increase. However, until then, hydropower’s potential will remain frustrated.
What needs to be done has been known for years. I think I first testified on the Hill concerning what should be done in 1999 although it has been evident… Read more »
Excellent points, Mark, especially the one on FERC. I should have made #2 clearer in that I meant large hydropower dams like Grand Coulee. I cannot imagine it being decommissioned… Read more »
Excellent points, but unlocking hydro’s potential does not involve only new developments. Many existing developments, both private and government, are tending towards the end of their life cycle, not so… Read more »
I think such partnerships would be ideal. Nearing the end of life-cycles is a huge issue across the energy spectrum. 110 GW is over 50 years old (mostly hydro with… Read more »
My only further comment is that solving the replacement/upgrade problem is the only presently feasible, climate friendly path to backstopping wind and solar resources, short of building more nuclear plants. Technological… Read more »
Hydropower has many dimensions, for providing 24 hour power throughout the United States. While there has been considerable effort in pushing more traditional hydropower applications, many experts have suggested a… Read more »
Agreed, this will take a global consensus and push to meet any climate goals economically. Since hydro and nuclear have historically been the only significant alternatives to coal, they both… Read more »
Hydropower is proven, least-cost and a reliable form of renewable clean power. While there is potential to power non-powered dams, the biggest opportunity for hydropower in the Pacific Northwest is… Read more »
Good point, David Zayas told me that the NHA and DOE have targeted 24 GW of pumped storage as the major push in their 20-year plan, over twice that of pouring… Read more »
The use of hydropower is a very mixed bag with much focus on traditional dams and pumped storage which in my view should not be considered at all as you… Read more »
Excellent info and thoughts, I need to digest and get back to you, but tidal does have a huge potential and would be caseload like you point out.
James I am sorry but tidal has extremely limited potential in part due to the limited number of locations where there is sufficient tidal forces to extract energy from and… Read more »
Yes, I agree, currents are a larger potential source. I would love to discuss jim@ufaventures.com
[…] policies could help boost the use of carbon capture and renewable energy sources like wind, hydro and solar which have few negative side effects and many upsides. Specifically, government policies […]
[…] policies could help boost the use of carbon capture and renewable energy sources like wind, hydro and solar which have few negative side effects and many upsides. Specifically, government… Read more »
[…] policies could help boost the use of carbon capture and renewable energy sources like wind, hydro and solar which have few negative side effects and many upsides. Specifically, government… Read more »