The Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS), which was recently amended to address numerous criticisms, is again under fire, this time for its potential effect on food prices. The RFS program requires an increasing volume of renewable fuel to be blended into transportation fuel each year and since its implementation in 2005, the US has become the world’s largest producer of ethanol fuel, a corn-based renewable fuel.
Yet many RFS critics argue that the mandate is responsible for driving up food prices. The authors of this UC Davis study concluded that “Corn prices were about 30 percent greater between 2006 and 2011 than they would have been without the mandate,” on account of factors such as a surge in corn storage in anticipation of ethanol‐production increases.
The U.S. livestock and poultry industries have expressed their support for legislation to repeal or amend the RFS. Senator Ben Cardin (D-MD) is currently writing a bill to reform it, and Senators John Barrasso (R-WY), Mark Pryor (D-AR) and Pat Toomey (R-PA) recently introduced “The Renewable Fuel Standard Repeal Act” (S. 1195).
An ABF Economics study recently concluded, however, that there is no direct correlation between the RFS and the overall increase in food prices. In a hearing on the RFS, Dr. Joseph Glauber, Chief Economist for USDA offered this testimony: “Corn ethanol production has been a factor; however, the rise in commodity prices over the past few years has been due to a variety of factors, such as increasing global demand, key production shortfalls due to droughts, as well as increasing energy prices, and any increase in farm prices for corn and soybeans due to increased biofuels production has likely had only a small effect on U.S. retail food prices.”
Are food prices impacted by the RFS? If so, what is the best way to balance the use of ethanol with the impact on food prices?
I believe that corn is one of the most water intensive foods we raise. In view of our ongoing discussion about energy and water I believe we have to look… Read more »
The water footprint of US corn is 1,220 gallons of water per gallon of ethanol produced. It is much higher elsewhere in the world (global average 2,570 gal/gal or liter/liter). … Read more »
The price of food is very strongly correlated with the price of oil, as is (less strongly) the price of ethanol. More importantly, the use of ethanol has been estimated… Read more »
Cultivated liquid biofuels such as ethanol are hugely dependent upon fossil fuel energy inputs, and this is one reason for the high price correlation. The huge amount of ammonia fertilizer… Read more »
Are food prices impacted by the RFS? Of course they are. Even the ABF Economics study cited in its defense concedes that corn ethanol production “has been a factor” in… Read more »
Of course, it would be better if the US RFS was focused on the outcome (percentage of renewable fuel) than prescriptive (specifying ethanol or another particular additive). That would let… Read more »
I agree that focusing on the truly renewable fraction of biofuels is key. When rigorous lifecycle analyses of “renewability,” GHG reductions, and environmental impacts are peformed in accordance with ISO… Read more »
Agree with Captain Kiefer comment above. First generation biofuel is not efficient at all and is competing with food production. So US RFS should push for Second generation biofuel (Agriculture… Read more »
Reid Detchon makes the factually unsupported assertion that food prices are highly correlated with oil prices. However, oil is only one source of energy used by the food sector. Food producers… Read more »
I need to make a correction to my prior post. I copied an Excel formula that referenced the wrong cell for the percent increase in wholesale farm commodity prices. The actual… Read more »
The RFS was established to begin to diversify our transportation fuel mix. Ethanol was blended at 10% to displace the higher aromatics in gasoline to increase octane. These aromatics cost… Read more »