As Chairman of the House Subcommittee on Energy and Power, I’m continuing the fight against President Obama’s Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) overregulation of our nation’s power plants without any regard to the consequences for our economy and consumers.
This week, the EPA is expected to release its proposed rule regulating carbon dioxide emissions from existing and modified electricity power plants. This effort is certain to result in a de facto cap and trade program, which Congress most recently rejected in 2009. This regulation follows the proposed rule on new power plants, which essentially makes it illegal to build a power plant using coal as a fuel source. On May 27th, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce released a study on the anticipated regulation that suggests these proposed EPA regulations, if enacted, will cost billions of dollars and hundreds of thousands of domestic jobs. The Chamber’s Institute for 21st Century Energy report entitled “Assessing the Impact of Proposed New Carbon Regulations in the United States” argues that the combined regulations for new and existing power plants would lower U.S. Gross Domestic Product by $51 billion and lead to a loss of 224,000 U.S. jobs on average every year through 2030. Additionally, the study determined that these regulations could cause America’s electricity costs to rise by $289 billion through 2030.
Despite the steep price tag and impact to the economy, these expected EPA regulations will not have a meaningful impact on global carbon emissions, which the Administration claims causes climate change. Even EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy who has testified before The Energy and Power Subcommittee said these rules will have minimal benefit to overall carbon emissions. It is clear that this administration is pushing regulations that are full of costs and no benefits, ultimately bankrupting the American people. I will continue to fight for Americans to have affordable energy in the current trying economic climate.
In addition to previous EPA regulations that have already contributed to an unprecedented number of coal plant shutdowns, it is clear these proposed regulations could threaten the reliability of our nation’s power grid, our economic growth, and the price of power for consumers as we know it. I will continue to fight President Obama’s radical agenda and ensure the EPA’s regulatory assault does not go unchecked.
Please share your comments on this issue.
The president promised under his plan, electricity rates would “necessarily skyrocket” and this is one promise he is actually delivering on. Four years after a Democratic Senate rejected cap-and-trade, the administration continues its… Read more »
US electricity prices have risen faster than the overall CPI during only two periods in our history: the first was during the Carter-era push for wind and solar energy, and… Read more »
“it is between the assumptions made by uncritical advocates of a feel-good approach to energy, and the hard data on actual costs and benefits of each alternative.” For a piece… Read more »
Mr. Mullins, Thank you for bringing up the “whole-risk” perspective on addressing threats. I believe that is exactly what we need. So far the “threat” of “global warming” or “climate… Read more »
Captain Kiefer, thank you for the prompt and considered reply. You note: “Doing real damage today in crude attempts to prevent uncertain future damage is not prudent. It’s called “malpractice”… Read more »
I agree, resilience is the key. Preserving and creating resilience requires redundancy, adaptability, flexibility, survivabilility, and reduced susceptibility — each of which have very specific meanings in the risk lexicon. … Read more »
It is probably not useful to run through the entire list of claims made in Mr. Kiefer’s post, but a quick check of real data (from the EIA: http://www.eia.gov/electricity/data.cfm#sales) shows… Read more »
Professor Brecha, Good to see physicists on the forum. The EIA is the source of my data. Specifically, Average Price (Cents/kilowatthour) by State by Provider, 1990-2012 referencing Total Electric Industry… Read more »
I am an licensed chemical engineer in four states that has worked in Natural Gas, electricity, and cogeneration. When in college in the 70’s I worked on coal liquefaction research… Read more »
Dear Congressman Whitfield, It’s good to see that the choir has responded to your call. However, this American’s opinion is that people (and the related subset of corporations) can burn… Read more »
I too, as a former local elected official appreciate the fact that you are willing to hear opinions from a variety of citizens. Thanks for the opportunity. I too disagree… Read more »
“On-site solar is now cost competitive in Hawaii.” Really? Hawaiians are paying 34 cent/kWh today, so, even if this claim were true (it is not), it is not much of… Read more »
It is my understanding that most of Hawaii’s energy comes from imported oil … a good reason that it is so expensive. I know nothing about their one coal plant… Read more »
Jane, do you have any data on Hawaii solar payback from a non-advocacy, less-partial, non-propaganda website source — say perhaps EIA or a university paper published in a peer-reviewed journal?
Not really. Here are some sites … Hawaii has a state tax credit and then there is the 30% federal credit good until 2016. The prices in Hawaii are at… Read more »
The fact of the matter is that we have clean air — the cleanest in the world. EPA’s regs will cause meaningless pain for families across the country who already… Read more »
Those poor people you supposedly want to protect need a more “affordable” economy – one with a more level playing field. I have three forty-something children, all well educated and… Read more »
Laura: The new EPA regs focus on greenhouse gases, not particulates. We may have “clean air”, but on a per-capita basis we are among the largest contributors to climate change,… Read more »
In 2012, more renewable energy utility-scale electric generation came on-line in the USA than natural gas — and both were over 80% of all new generation. In 2013, natural gas… Read more »
Renewable Energy investment peaked globally in 2011. The world is figuring out the the very real costs and damages and the elusive benefits, but not before effectively bankrupting Spain and… Read more »
Methyl Mercury, virtually all from burning fossil fuels – do the homework.
Today’s announcement by the EPA is a modest first step towards real action to move towards a carbon-neutral electrical grid. Coal-fired power plants have higher costs in terms of… Read more »
Unless a discussion of global warming includes China, it is not on topic. Any effort we take in the United States to reduce emissions is not going to be effective… Read more »
Richard’s point is also true for other emissions besides CO2. EPA’s insatiable obsession with straining out the flyspecks of the last few ppm of sulfur and mercury from everything (except… Read more »
2 points: 1) China is acting, both in directly ratcheting down new coal builds (though this is health related as much as climate) and by developing its own carbon market.… Read more »
Killing thousands of people today with energy poverty to mitigate a future threat that is not developing as forecast is not standing on the “moral high ground.”
I appreciate the challenge of energy poverty in the developing world can’t be understated. I also appreciate that “energy poverty is worse than climate change” is a now popular talking… Read more »
Elias, You are mistaken to believe that energy poverty and linked premature mortality are only a problem in undeveloped nations. They hit hard in developed nations as well. The lethal… Read more »
Ike, To your points below (can’t add a reply): 1) Not sure I read those charts as illustrating a statistically meaningful rise in deaths attributable to energy poverty (certainly not a consistent… Read more »
Congressman Whitfield attacks the Obama administration proposed EPA power plant CO2 emissions regulation initiative quoting a US Chamber of Commerce study, which is not the best source to assess the… Read more »
Reports about this proposed new regulation by USEPA limiting carbon dioxide emissions at existing coal power plants portray it as just a logical progression of the policy mandate given US… Read more »
Yes…and no. Yes, low natural gas prices have resulted in economic pressure for coal units to shut down (or to operate less). The retired capacity was generally older, smaller, unscrubbed,… Read more »
Congressman Whitfield- The rules released today by President Obama and the EPA do not plan to eliminate coal or fossil fuel energy, but instead ensure that it is being produced… Read more »
Great timely and lively debate. One request, as people are throwing around all kinds of claims I think it is important to reference factual claims (or other positions that can… Read more »
First, comments/expanded discussion on a few statements: From Congressman Whitfield: “Despite the steep price tag and impact to the economy, these expected EPA regulations will not have a meaningful impact… Read more »
Dawn, Really appreciate your very informative comments throughout these discussions. Your insight above into the necessary role of RTO/ISO and new dispatch rules to implement national carbon emissions limits is… Read more »
This is a continuation of the earlier exchange with Captain Keifer: You stated in response: “I agree, resilience is the key. Preserving and creating resilience requires redundancy, adaptability, flexibility, survivabilility,… Read more »
Mr. Mullins, I appreciate your perspective and your service. Again I think we are in violent agreement. Leadership and the commander’s imagination and innovation trump pure technology and firepower advantage… Read more »
Yesterday, EPA announced proposed performance standards for existing power plants under the Clean Air Act (also known as the existing source performance standards, or ESPS). It’s complicated, and the details matter. But… Read more »
Nathan, In the spirit of crunching data until clarity ensues this piece is worth looking at: http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-cap-matters-most-in-cap-and-trade-markets/ In its gist it points out that when it comes to market incentives… Read more »
“LIKE PLAYING POKER? GET READY TO PAY A LOT MORE FOR POWER”, The EPA proposes a well intended law to reduce carbon emissions, but forgets that hell may be paved… Read more »
I can’t consider anything put out by the Chamber of Commerce to be credible since they are a self-interested organization with an axe to grind, not an impartial think tank… Read more »
The analysis for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce was conducted by IHS, which is a well-respected energy economics company that has performed analysis for both industry and government agencies. Their… Read more »
I’ve been enjoying this excellent discussion from the sidelines these past few days. Here are my two cents, coming from the perspective of one who was in charge of the… Read more »
I found your contribution very interesting. Not a lawyer my question is … can ‘substitution’ in the economic sense be a factor in your analysis of the EPA’s ability to… Read more »
To a very limited extent, that seems to be one of the things that EPA is suggesting in the proposed rule, Jane: reduce coal’s emissions, or replace that generation, to the… Read more »
Oh dear … First, I am talking about air pollution … not specifically CO2 which is just one pollutant, and I am not saying banning coal tomorrow. The rules never… Read more »
The coal plants with little or no pollution controls are retiring due to other air regulations. This carbon rule will apply to coal units that have already reduced air pollutants… Read more »
Sorry, Jane! I read your question – “Why can’t one specific method that pollutes the air be told it cannot continue unless and until it can stop polluting?” – as… Read more »
There is a whole raft of existing and pending EPA regulations that depend upon carbon being a pollutant and therefore subject to regulation under section 111(d) of the Clean Air… Read more »
There’s a lot of heated rhetoric flying around the newly proposed clean power plan, and NRDC Executive Director Peter Lehner just posted this blog entry about hearing much of it before: There… Read more »
Unfortunately, your reply illustrates the “battle of the numbers” that has coarsened this debate over the years. As I said, I’m equally skeptical of environmentalists and companies that are in… Read more »
Sigh. Some basic facts. The coal plants that are subject to this rule are almost all very old and quite outmoded — leaving carbon pollution aside. Many of them are… Read more »
Thank you all for your input. As the Energy and Power Subcommittee prepares to hold a hearing on this issue the week of June 16th, the perspective you’ve offered has… Read more »
Congressman Whitfield, Thank you for taking the time to host the conversation. Would be most interested to get your response to this article. I’ve been saying publicly since the rules… Read more »
Climate change is a critical problem to solve and the damages in the future are not uncertain. In fact, I’d argue between droughts in the western U.S. and hurricanes, U.S.… Read more »
The solution to the energy problem must involve cost effective technology. Unfortunately, most of the renewable energy technology being talk about is not cost effective now and has no real… Read more »
A bit late. That ship just sailed. The hearings will be boring, I’m afraid. It’s all been said and fed into the mill. EPA just took A long time to… Read more »
Wholesale energy prices tell the story – not opinions, rhetoric or political tendencies. In doing a quick review of comments above, it appears most of you are not (or have… Read more »
If solar and wind were not subsidized or mandated, and had to bid for blocks on the day-ahead market like everyone else, then their wholesale prices would be meaningful. However,… Read more »
I am reluctant to enter this discussion simply because the opening proposition from Congressman Whitfield is an ideological diatribe and not a statement of fact. Nonetheless, this American welcomes the… Read more »
Well said!
How is taking an action to improve the environment, create jobs, and eventually bring down electric rates so horrible? As an Independent, I am tired of politicians attacking each other… Read more »
Centrifugal separation of fly ash, mercury, CO2, NOx, and SOx in the open von Karman geometry (counter-rotating coaxial impellers with axial extraction) would avoid the water waste of amine scrubbing. … Read more »
Southern Company’s new facility in Kemper Mississippi shows clearly that CCS technology is available at commercial scale. Clearly, Southern Company would not invest $5+billion if they did not think so.… Read more »
“Southern Company’s new facility in Kemper Mississippi shows clearly that CCS technology is available at commercial scale. Clearly, Southern Company would not invest $5+billion if they did not think so.”… Read more »
There’s a lot more in development than conventional CCS. Getting CO2 down within the fenceline could involve increasing plant fuel efficiency by waste heat power harvesting from turbine exhaust steam,… Read more »
AMERICANS OVERLOOK ENERGY AND WATER PICTURE Dear Energy and Power Subcommittee Chairman Whitfield and Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Upton, I joke, but seriously, though coal physically produces 27% more carbon… Read more »
In 2013, the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) met the Administration’s 30% carbon reduction goal. Other utilities can surely do the same by 2030. TVA is a federally owned corporation and… Read more »
Professor Brown, TVA has reduced carbon emissions primarily by producing less power due to reduced demand following the 2008 economic crash and the loss of its biggest customer, the huge… Read more »
Dawn, Regarding comments on the IPCC report … The IPCC wants us to leave 75% of fossil resources in the ground in order to meet the 2C degree maximum temperature… Read more »
With all due respect to the Congressman, it’s a bit disingenuous to make the argument that we shouldn’t act because it won’t make a difference unless other major GHG emitting… Read more »
Wil, As director of the climate center of a prestigious university, I would expect you are well-informed of the detailed findings published by the UN IPCC in the 2013 Working… Read more »
I’d like to pick up on a topic that has been raised by a number of others – costs vs. benefits. In their fact sheet, the EPA estimates public… Read more »
This is the same EPA that has been forced to admit by the National Academy of Sciences that their RFS2 program has increased both GHG emissions and polluting ozone and… Read more »
David – regarding benefit-cost analysis (BCA) of EPA rules: as the proposed rule is on carbon emissions (not HAPs or criteria pollutants), when quantifying benefits EPA should be including only… Read more »
Congressman Whitfield: I quote from your post: “Obama’s EPA to to cost Americans billions of dollars and hundreds of thousands of jobs…….This week, the EPA is expected to release its… Read more »
ENERGY, WATER, FOOD, HEALTH AND MONEY ARE LINKED Dear Energy and Power Subcommittee Chairman Whitfield, Legislation on coal fuel in Congress might consider that well meant, popular “GREEN THEORIES” no longer… Read more »
The robust debate on the consequences of EPA regulations under the Clean Air Act indicates that most commentators agree that the electric utility industry will accelerate the replacement of coal-fired… Read more »