Full Title: Can Pollution Markets Work in Developing Countries? Experimental Evidence from India
Author(s): Michael Greenstone, Rohini Pande, Nicholas Ryan, and Anant Sudarshan
Publisher(s): University of Chicago Energy Policy Institute
Publication Date: April 1, 2025
Full Text: Download Resource
Description (excerpt):
Market-based environmental regulations are seldom used in low-income countries, where pollution is highest but state capacity is often low. The authors collaborated with the Gujarat Pollution Control Board (GPCB) to design and experimentally evaluate the world’s first particulate-matter emissions market, which covered industrial plants in a large Indian city. There are three main findings. First, the market functioned well. Treatment plants, randomly assigned to the emissions market, traded permits to become significant net sellers or buyers. After trading, treatment plants held enough permits to cover their emissions 99% of the time, compared with just 66% compliance with standards under the command-and-control status quo. Second, treatment plants reduced pollution emissions, relative to control plants, by 20%–30%. Third, the market reduced abatement costs by an estimated 11%, holding constant emissions. This cost-savings estimate is based on plant-specific marginal cost curves that the authors estimate from the universe of bids to buy and sell permits in the market. The combination of pollution reductions and low costs imply that the emissions market has mortality benefits that exceed its costs by at least 25 times.