Back to OurEnergyLibrary search




Cross-Species Comparison of Ultramafic Rock Bio-Accelerated Weathering Performance

Cross-Species Comparison of Ultramafic Rock Bio-Accelerated Weathering Performance

Full Title: Cross-Species Comparison of Ultramafic Rock Bio-Accelerated Weathering Performance
Author(s): Plante, Jacob D. Klug, Joseph J. Lee, Adrian Hornby, James Adair , Sabrina Marecos, Matthew C. Reid, Esteban Gazel, and Buz Barstow
Publisher(s): Nature
Publication Date: August 1, 2025
Full Text: Download Resource
Description (excerpt):

Carbon mineralization sequesters atmospheric CO2 by reacting it with cations from rock weathering to form carbonates. However, natural rates are too slow, and acceleration with chemical or mechanical methods is expensive. Microbial processes (acidolysis, redoxolysis, complexolysis) could speed weathering with less energy. However, no microorganisms have been employed at industrial scale to dissolve ultramafic rocks. Although some microbes dissolve ultramafic rocks), their performance remains poorly understood. Here, we compare the dissolution of dunite (> 90% olivine) by three mineral-dissolving microbes: Gluconobacter oxydansSphingomonas desiccabilis and Penicillium simplicissimum. G. oxydans outperformed the others, producing the most acidic biolixiviant (pH 2.15 at 1% pulp density) and extracting the most magnesium (3,130 mg/L at 3% pulp density). It also co-dissolved nine metals, including eight critical for energy technologies (Cr, Mn, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn) reaching up to 33 mg/L Ni. Increasing pulp density boosted metal dissolution by G. oxydans and S. desiccabilis but inhibited P. simplicissimum above 2% pulp density. These results show G. oxydans is best suited for engineering to enhance bio-accelerated weathering, reducing costs and environmental impacts. Finally, both G. oxydans and P. simplicissimum can use cellulosic hydrolysate instead of glucose, lowering substrate costs for biolixiviant production

All statements and/or propositions in discussion prompts are meant exclusively to stimulate discussion and do not represent the views of OurEnergyPolicy.org, its Partners, Topic Directors or Experts, nor of any individual or organization. Comments by and opinions of Expert participants are their own.