Back to OurEnergyLibrary search




Testing Factors that Enhance Private Participation in Payments for Ecosystem Service Programs Targeting Flood Mitigation

Testing Factors that Enhance Private Participation in Payments for Ecosystem Service Programs Targeting Flood Mitigation

Full Title: Testing Factors that Enhance Private Participation in Payments for Ecosystem Service Programs Targeting Flood Mitigation
Author(s): Tibor Vegh, Todd K. BenDor, and Frederick W. Cubbage
Publisher(s): ScienceDirect
Publication Date: March 8, 2025
Full Text: Download Resource
Description (excerpt):

To address the severe consequences of low participation, more studies are needed that empirically evaluate how different factors affect enrollment in payments for ecosystem services (PES) programs. In this paper, we provide empirical insight into how different land-leasing, purchase, and management arrangements might affect potential participants’ willingness to enroll in these programs. The authors administer a choice experiment in the coastal plain of the State of North Carolina (USA), to explore how a hypothetical, flood mitigation-focused PES program could optimize participation across a variety of natural infrastructure practices and across multiple aspects of program design.

The authors find evidence that higher proportions of total household income from farming have a significant relationship with the likelihood of participation in PES programs that seek to mitigate flooding. Other factors that were examined – including income loss from past flood events, respondents’ previous participation in PES programs, and different combinatorial arrangements of payment structuring and timing – had no discernable relationship to initial decisions about program participation. Furthermore, the authors find evidence for the importance of previous participation in PES programs as a key factor in decisions regarding the extent or level of program participation. In light of this, they propose a risk-based reframing of PES program participation decisions. From this risk avoidance perspective, they theorize that potential participants who are more dependent on farming revenue for their income may be proportionally more risk averse to any actions that could complicate farming or endanger future farming revenue.

All statements and/or propositions in discussion prompts are meant exclusively to stimulate discussion and do not represent the views of OurEnergyPolicy.org, its Partners, Topic Directors or Experts, nor of any individual or organization. Comments by and opinions of Expert participants are their own.

Sign up for our Press Release Distribution List

    Your Name (required)

    Your Email (required)

    Please sign me up to receive press releases from OurEnergyPolicy.org.