Wind energy is a good renewable solution for parts of the nation. The challenge with wind is accommodating its variability and uncertainty. It means that using the current technology, wind must work in conjunction with natural gas powered plants that could be started quickly to fill production gaps. It increases the capital costs of the electrical utilities.
We have good wind conditions only in parts of the country (like the great plains and the NE off-shore), and the cost of transmission rises with the distance. Therefore, because of instability, cost and distance, wind can only supply a few percent of our electrical consumption. Understanding the limitations of wind does not mean that we should not use it — on the contrary — but only in areas where it makes economic sense.
There are policies and technologies (existing and under development) that can increase the percentage of safe use of wind technology. A feasibility cost study of each should be conducted. The cost of wind power is becoming very competitive. Prioritizing the methods that will allow us to improve its penetration is economically sensible.
The policy should focus on:
- Extend the federal credits for the next 10-15 years. The current short term regulations create instability for the investors and slow down the development of wind solutions. Investors need stability and predictability. The current renew/don’t renew political episodes every couple of years is bad for our country.
- Improving the wind technologies until it becomes price competitive and does not require federal and local government subsidies. The cost of wind power is close to being competitive. The bottleneck is material costs and turbine production rate. Market forces are already at work.
- Removing federal and local roadblocks for building wind power stations. NIMBY regulations may be required to speed-up implementation.
- Wind electricity faces the same power transmission problems as all new energy locations (See transmission). Solving the transmission bottleneck is critical for renewable technologies.
A longer term goal is the development of cheap large capacity storage of electricity. It will allow the usage of generated energy based on demand and will greatly boost the economical viability of wind technology. When large capacity energy storage becomes available, our solar and wind policies will need to change.
On August 4, 2010 the U.S. Department of Energy released its “2009 Wind Technologies Market Report.” This report, authored primarily by Ryan Wiser and Mark Bolinger of Lawrence Berkeley National… Read more »
Dr. Wiser, Thanks very much for sharing your DOE Wind Market Report and informative summary with us. It looks like an excellent report and it is very nice to see… Read more »
The DOE report estimated transmission costs associated with 20 percent wind of $60 billion nominal, $20 billion on a discounted basis. Not a minor sum, but just about 10 percent… Read more »
Capacity is not the useful number for an intermittent source, we need production rates in KWHr to evaluate contribution.
Milt Levenson
Agreed, but capacity is what most folks are used to seeing, so we report data in capacity terms AS WELL AS energy terms. The report contains selective use of both.… Read more »
The reply that natural gas plants have similar capacity factors overlooks a very key point–natural gas plants most often operate as peaking plants and are turned on and off as… Read more »
This is of course true. Generation sources all have different characteristics. Some are easier to handle from a power supply/load balancing perspective, others harder. Some are easier to handle from… Read more »
We are pleased to announce that Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory today released a new report: “The Impact of Wind Power Projects on Residential Property Values in the United States: A… Read more »