You don’t have to search hard to find an American community already experiencing, firsthand, the devastating impact of climate change. The question is no longer if, but how to respond. For too long, damaging carbon emissions have been left off the balance sheets of the world’s largest polluters. Instead, we are all paying the price. That’s why we need a market-driven solution that will get us to zero emissions.
I introduced a bipartisan plan—the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 763)—to put a price on carbon and send a signal across the economy that it is time to switch to clean energy. It starts at a modest $15 per ton fee and quickly ratchets up by $10 per year. It will reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 38% by 2030—exceeding our Paris Agreement commitments—and by 90% by 2050, according to estimates from a Columbia University Center on Global Energy Policy report.
It will drive clean power innovations that make business-sense as much as they make climate-sense, and it will create an estimated 2 million net jobs over ten years. We consider the potential rise in energy costs to consumers by giving 100% of net revenues back to the American people as a monthly dividend check, amounting to as much as $367 per month to a family of four. And by making our air cleaner, we can prevent an estimated 13,000 pollution-related deaths. Columbia University estimates that the bill would reduce harmful power plant emissions by 95% by 2030.
We need a drastic turn away from hundreds of years of unchecked carbon pollution toward a carbon-free economy. But we must root this dramatic change in justice. Those who have profited from the destruction of our environment must pay the price. And we must protect the people who have been locked into a carbon-heavy lifestyle through no fault of their own.
It’s important to set goals and targets. But we need to do something to get us there. This bill can do exactly that.
Dear Congressman Deutch: Thank you for your leadership on this critical issue! While so much needs to be done, a fundamental step forward is to put a price on carbon.… Read more »
Another way to use the revenue from the carbon fee is to invest in clean energy, infrastructure, and funds to help workers and communities transition to a cleaner energy economy.… Read more »
I have to agree with Dan on this one that the money collected should be shown on a spread sheet and how much was distributed to # of households. I… Read more »
Dear Congressman Panetta: While public spending on clean energy R&D and infrastructure is greatly needed, you should not fund such activities through the carbon fee. In order to get public… Read more »
Congressman Deutch, you are certainly correct that now is the time for a carbon price; it is past time. A few years ago Advanced Biofuels USA, a nonprofit educational organization… Read more »
1) Does a price on carbon need to be part of any larger effort to reduce carbon emissions? Absolutely. Even if we retain other policies, a carbon tax will make… Read more »
Gavin Donohue (President and CEO, Independent Power Producers of New York)—in an OurEnergyPolicy live panel discussion on February 26, 2020—said a carbon price in New York State would fit into… Read more »
2) What are other ways revenue from a carbon fee could be used? Is returning 100% as a monthly dividend to Americans the best use? IMO, the carbon price itself… Read more »
I want to add my voice to those thanking Congressman Deutch for HR 763 and urging its passage. I think it is essential that we have a carbon-pricing mechanism that… Read more »
Marc Hafstead (Fellow and Director of the Carbon Pricing Initiative, Resources for the Future) responded to the question of how carbon tax/fee revenues should be used in an OurEnergyPolicy live… Read more »
3) A carbon fee will not resolve all of the problems of climate change. What other policies could complement a carbon fee policy? There are other measures that would help… Read more »
Robert Litterman (Founding Partner, Kepos Capital) responded to the question of what other policies could complement a carbon fee in an OurEnergyPolicy live panel discussion in New York City on… Read more »
Marc Hafstead (Fellow and Director of the Carbon Pricing Initiative, Resources for the Future), in the same event, also remarked on this, saying that decarbonizing the transportation will require further… Read more »
It is nice to see that carbon pricing is actually moving forward in our national discussion. I have supported a carbon price in the past. However, now that renewable wind… Read more »
Jane: A few responses… 1. While there is no political will right now (in the US) to do anything substantive, that hopefully will change soon. A Fee and Dividend policy… Read more »
First … Amory Lovins did not just ‘suggest’ that electrification could keep us below the 2 degree limit. It is the conclusion from a research paper (Amory B Lovins et… Read more »
I agree that we should pursue every way to reduce emissions and I believe that the private sector will do its part, such as the recent Microsoft announcement. But we… Read more »
Dan, Your study is from 2018 and the point that Lovins et al are making is very different. There is no ‘comfort’ there. It is a criticism of the models… Read more »
I looked at the paper. It talks about lowering carbon intensity (per $ of GDP) and the like. But global emissions are still rising. Between the current Earth energy imbalance… Read more »
Just another problem that highlights the fact that price is not determinative for de-carbonization …. If the bill now proposed in become laws, “Indiana would join Wyoming and Ohio as… Read more »
There appears to be a consensus here and elsewhere on putting a price on carbon. The implication being that there is a zero cost. Many states are increasing their taxes… Read more »
Bill: As you point out, putting a tax on fossil fuels lowers their consumption. A carbon fee is meant to accelerate the transition away from fossil fuels and the higher… Read more »
Dan Yogi Berra is alleged to have said that the difference between theory and practice is that in theory, theory and practice are the same but in practice they are… Read more »
Bill: 1) A $100/ton carbon fee is about $0.90/gallon of gasoline for the gasoline alone (there are 19.64 pounds on CO2 in a gallon of gasoline). Supply chain emissions (that… Read more »
1. $100/ton of carbon translates tp $10/barrei and that is close to 25 cent per gallon. I have not seen any source that shows it to be 9 cents; virtually… Read more »
1. Sorry, I was wrong… I always quote $0.10/gallon for the starting $10/ton carbon fee. At $100/ton, it is around $1/gallon (I’ve corrected my post above). Not high enough to… Read more »
Congressman Deutch, I agree that carbon taxes are a key part of an overall solution to the global warming crisis. They require consumers to pay for the environmental impact of… Read more »
Henry: Some high-level comments: 1) I don’t believe anyone is saying that a carbon fee is the only policy that is needed. It is a key policy but we need… Read more »
Most economists learn in their first course on microeconomics that a simple tax on a pollution like carbon emission gives the optimal response to reduce that pollutant. that works great… Read more »
Paul: You can’t have competitive markets when one product, fossil fuels, gets to privatize the profits and socialize the costs. To have a competitive market, the external (socialized) costs must… Read more »
I tend to feel despair when climate proposals are discussed at a kind of astral plane of tneoretical reality. When Ban Ki Moon introduced our session on Korean TV, HE… Read more »
Paul: There is a global unwritten policy that says you can pollute the atmosphere with greenhouse gases for free. This policy is why we have climate change. Of course, (most)… Read more »
In the end, an optimal policy (to minimize the risk of human extinction at minimum real economic But cost) WOULD include a carbon fee, in my analysis (reviewed in that… Read more »
It sounds a bit strange to hear that we should “minimize the risk of human extinction” at “minimum real economic cost”. When we fought World War II, I don’t believe… Read more »
The rational strategy is (1) a carbon tax, (2) rebate to citizens and (3) a large research, development and demonstration program for new technologies. A carbon tax is the only… Read more »
This conversation is critical, but it is important to ground it in empirical history. The short answer to the questions is, ” 1) Yes, we need carbon pricing, but not… Read more »
Carl: Putting a price on carbon is a critical step but no one I am aware of says it’s the only step (except, perhaps, the Climate Leadership Council). I agree… Read more »
Dan, I have just read something I would like to add to this discussion. As I said I was in favor of the carbon tax in the past, but now… Read more »
Jane: As you can see from this discussion, the idea of a carbon fee is gaining momentum and, as I say in my TEDx talk on Fee and Dividend, is… Read more »
My point was that the lending cut off is the bank’s choice – no political capital entailed, just enlightened bankers.
Yes, it’s exciting that banks are moving in this direction and other private companies like Microsoft have committed to being carbon negative. But we are so far behind the eight… Read more »
You do not have to convince me that action is required immediately. Time would be better spent convincing investors that fossil fuel is no longer a good investment …. that… Read more »
It was good to read many comments in favor of the fee and dividend form of a carbon tax. I support that. It also was very good to read comments… Read more »
Herschel: “Renewable Fuels” (RF) made from CO2 and renewable hydrogen from H2O is certainly doable. It’s based on decades-old technology. The sticking point is the cost of renewable hydrogen. Hydrogen… Read more »
Dan, One benefit of making hydrocarbons at sea is the infinite supply of hydrogen. As to off-shore wind and making hydrocarbons, this process eliminates the variability issue for wind. There… Read more »
The Guardian reports that a leaked report from one of the biggest financiers of fossil fuel infrastructure says the world is on an unsustainable path and that a carbon tax… Read more »
The carbon tax is one of the few widely accepted directions for progress. But instead of crude implementation like “returning revenue to cosumers” it would need sophisticated and flexible management… Read more »
Frank: A few points: 1) HR763 already excludes agriculture (and the military). But the studies that show the bottom 70% of households make more money on the dividend than they… Read more »
1. A price on carbon is critical and the greater the better. Global warming is a consequence of fossil fuel use and yet not built into the cost of oil… Read more »
Although a carbon tax may be the ideal policy to speed the nation’s transition to a sustainable low/no-carbon economy, I think it necessary to consider political realities. Opposition to a… Read more »
The current Republican administration and Senate will not support any bold action on climate change and they don’t even acknowledge that it is a significant problem. If we want to… Read more »
The failure to price carbon is a major cause of climate change. I agree that pricing carbon is only one of many solutions to mitigating climate change, and one that… Read more »
A viable climate change solution needs to be big and lasting. This policy puts a fee on fossil fuels like coal, oil, and gas. It starts low, and grows over… Read more »
Thank you all for the discussion! For additional information and discussion on this topic, please see the event summary and recording on our event page for our February 26, 2020,… Read more »