A National Energy Program (NEP) is proposed to eliminate the gap between U.S. oil consumption and production and significantly reduce green house gas emissions in a decade to place our nation on the road to a sustainable energy future. With domestic natural gas plentiful, eliminating the “oil gap” will achieve energy independence. The international Energy Agency forecasts this gap to be approximately seven million barrels and day (MBD) in 2025 [1]. Forecasts vary from 4-7 MBD depending on source used. Current forecasts are “not real world”; because they are based on continuation of business as usual conditions in an increasingly unstable world. To cover “downside risk” the goal is set near the upper end of the range to be at least six MBD. President Obama set a goal to reduce green house gas emissions to 26-28% below 2005 levels by 2025; which was 10% above the 2012 level [2]. This equals a reduction of at least 1,300 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent.
America’s strategy must be to treat energy independence as a matter of national security to avoid chaos. According to the Department of Defense the “arc of instability” running through North Africa and Southeast Asia could become an “arc of chaos” involving the military forces of several nations. Turmoil in energy producing nations is on the rise, with increased potential for future combat operations. The implications for future conflicts are ominous should states see the need to militarily secure energy resources [3]. Seven of top ten nations with largest oil and gas reserves are in this region [4]. Every barrel of oil America produces, conserves and replaces with alternatives is a barrel of oil available on the world market we won’t have to defend.
The approaches used to manage Apollo, finance and build the Interstate Highways and transform the nation during World War II are adapted to produce an overview of a strategy and plan to achieve energy independence in this white paper. These efforts were of necessity national undertakings; because, they were instituted to deal with national security threats. A National Energy Program focuses on a similar threat and will be planned and implemented accordingly.
Apollo was a race against time. NEP promises to be a similar race set in turbulent times replete with unexpected and increasingly volatile conditions at home and abroad. Americans of nearly every political stripe are waiting and wondering whether their leaders are prepared to let the nation that saved the world in the twentieth century sink into history in the twenty first. We stand at a crossroads. We simply can’t risk going down the same path increasingly divorced from the real threats of today and the growing ones tomorrow. Will tomorrow belong to America? The genius of America is our ability to transform to meet changing conditions and new threats and become a better and stronger nation. Achieving energy independence is the right place to start.
Six top-level objectives and implementation scenarios that achieve the goal are presented in a National Energy Program white paper. A presentation provides a quick overview of NEP:
• Building & Processes Sector: Replace oil use and reduce emissions in energy efficient buildings and processes that meet end user needs and achieve the goal.
• Transportation Sector: Replace oil use and reduce emissions in a conventional and alternative motor vehicles fleet that meets end user needs and achieve the goal.
• Power Sector: Replace oil use in end user facilities and reduce emissions in an energy efficient, safe and secure 21st century power sector that meets end user needs and achieves the goal.
• Fuels Sector: Replaces oil use and reduce emissions in a fuel sector that achieves the goal and will always be able to provide fuel for vehicles on our roads and tanks on the battlefield.
• Defense Sector: Replace oil use in an energy efficient U.S. military that has the operational energy security to go and win America’s wars without initial access to theater bases and energy supplies.
• Energy Technologies R, D&D: Develop and deploy energy technologies in “rank order” based on ability to achieve sector objectives and the goal.
Please find the White Paper and Presentation for the National Energy Program here.
[1] EIA, Annual Energy outlook, 2013 early release and short term energy outlook, March 2013
[2] FACT SHEET: U.S.-China Joint Announcement on Climate Change and Clean Energy Cooperation.
[3] “Joint Operating Environment 2010 Report” DOD Joint Forces Command
[4] EIA Data through 2012 by country, region
It is dismaying and (to me) disheartening to see all of the erroneous ideas of 1970s, rehashed here in 2014. I would recommend to anyone interested in understanding why most… Read more »
Outside the ivory tower the world is coming apart and our troops take casualties defending the oil supply. When I see terrorists holding oil fields and refineries I am not… Read more »
You are welcome to believe what you want to believe, but I could cite numerous instances where the folks in the oil and gas industries were way off the mark… Read more »
What John is saying parallels what I am hearing from my other industry contacts. This bothers me as much as it others you. But, when I look through industry financials… Read more »
When I read the title of this thread, I thought a clean energy program was going to be proposed. It’s surprising to see a discussion of national energy supply and… Read more »
As I state in the white paper: “With a darkening landscape at home and abroad and time our most precious resource as the world’s oil supply moves from surplus to… Read more »
It is a choice between black and green energy. The bigger national security risk is continued emissions of GHG, mostly due to the burning of fossil fuels. A price on… Read more »
As I stated before: “With a darkening landscape at home and abroad and time our most precious resource as the world’s oil supply moves from surplus to shortfall, the issue… Read more »
Lawrence: I guess we can agree to disagree on future military risks. I agree we have fought ill considered wars in the past over oil. The cost of those wars… Read more »
Oil equality means US oil consumption = US oil production. I am interested in oil not gas because, America has a surplus of gas and a shortfall between oil consumption… Read more »
As someone who has spent the past 5 years advocating for renewable energy and attempting to create change in the “dark state” of Virginia, I just don’t see any hope… Read more »
I have no problem with Mr. Kraus’ list, and in fact, many leaders from both political parties have supported this list. The previous energy bills EPACT’05, EISA’07 and parts of… Read more »
Grossman’s comment provides a valuable reality check on this utopian proposal. So to some extent does Twitmyer. As Grossman notes, this sort of National Energy Plan was attempted by Jimmy… Read more »
Jane, Scott and Lewis see a different world than the world I see. Their world is a peace time world. Their methods are consistent with peacetime – promoting green energy… Read more »
Scientists tell us that we can’t burn more than 1/4th of the known fossil fuel reserves if we want to avoid catastrophic climate change (which, among other things, includes mass… Read more »
In reply to Dan. We will be supplanting oil consumption through NEP. (1) Oil equality means US oil consumption = US oil production. (2) To achieve this goal we will… Read more »
Dan, the answers to most of your questions are probably in the presentation (Click on it in the discussion prompt). Slide three below covers your last comment What is the… Read more »
Lawrence Klaus argues that impending world shortages of oil threaten our national security. He is right. Dan Miller argues that climate change threatens our national security. He too is right.… Read more »
Herschel: I generally agree with your points, but I would like to point out the following: 1) Climate change is unlike oil shortages — and almost all other environmental and… Read more »
We are in agreement. My goal and time frame are mentioned in a response to Dan above. Oil equality means US oil consumption = US oil production is the goal.… Read more »
We need to focus on energy security as a top priority and take steps away from our dependence on the unstable Middle East region, the instabilities that flow from it,… Read more »
Dan may have gotten the idea that I am against cap and trade. I am not. To repeat what I said in an earlier comment: (1) Oil equality means US… Read more »
Larry: If you support Cap and Trade (and, therefore, I assume the preferable Fee and Dividend or Cap and Dividend policies as well) then why go through all the trouble… Read more »
Yes we can have our cake and eat it too. All we need is a changing attitude in the investment community, which is slowly coming, and the willingness to face-off… Read more »
Personally (certainly NOT representing NSF) I agree with the spirit of what Lawrence is saying. As I read about what ISIL is doing, essentially all over the world, I remember… Read more »
I agree with Paul regarding the problems in the political arena, that lobbies maximize cost and minimize effectiveness. Arlen Specter was a Senator from my state and I miss him… Read more »
Dan, I am not arguing the facts of cap and trade. I will repeat what I said above. If we want to act like religious fundamentalists and insist on getting… Read more »
I agree with Lawrence Klaus that a coordinated program to develop alternative fuels to supplement oil supplies is needed. Conventional global crude production has already peaked and is in decline… Read more »
All very reasonable suggestions, but just a few words about fracking … This fracking boom is a really bad idea. Some think there is actually a fracking ‘bubble’ because the… Read more »
Jane – your comments about potential fracking problems are well spoken and well taken. Let me clarify that I was referring to fracking oil wells exclusively since gas fracking is… Read more »
Brian, we are in general agreement. Sustainability is part of the goal I propose which is “to achieve equality between U.S. oil consumption and production in a decade and position… Read more »
Any comprehensive national energy program would need to balance the security of US energy supplies, the environmental impact of US energy production and use, and the affordability of energy. I… Read more »
I agree with David regarding the potential multiplicity of goals and objectives for NEP. As I state in the NEP white paper, “A goal, six top level objectives and implementation… Read more »
I believe national defense should be our primary goal. Carbon abatement is already a de – facto goal. Check out the Federal EPA for details. The balancing of oil supply… Read more »
My exhibit “Gallery of Clean Energy Inventions” is linked at both commutefaster.com/vesperman.html and padrak.com/vesperman. A shorter version without exhibit setup details and movie posters is linked at https://app.box.com/CLEANENERGYEXHIBIT Displayed are… Read more »
NEP would like my idea to bury ALL fossil fuel and Nuclear fuel in 10 years once built. My comment from Wil Burns write up on “Is Bioenergy with CCS… Read more »